我們的理念

本中心於2007年7 月,由一群對音樂充滿熱誠的年青人創立。成立目的是為一些有志於音樂藝術教育上發展的年輕導師提供一個招生的空間,同時為一些尋師無門的家長們提供一個找尋合適導師的好地方。

為了讓孩子在音樂上有更良好的發展空間,我們除了安排導師介紹外,我們將會定期舉行學生音樂會,供本中心的會員參加,讓學生有多方面發展機會。

學習音樂,不能只靠課堂操練,實際的表演機會更能讓學生增加自信心,培養對音樂的興趣。故此,我們相信定期的表演或比賽,是學習音樂的一種推動力。


希望藉著我們對音樂的熱誠,附上我們的一分力,能成為有志於音樂教育發展的年青人的踏腳石,亦能為各位望子成龍的家長盡一點心意。

導師通告﹕

我們希望集合一群有志於音樂教育發展的年青人,互相交流心得,合作舉辦學生音樂會。如果你有興趣加入我們,或希望在我們的網站招生, 請將你的個人資料,相關資歷,演出/比賽經驗,教學經驗電郵到musictutors.hk@gmail.com


家長通告﹕

如果各位家長希望尋找心目中理想的導師,請將導師要求,學生資料,上課詳情電郵到musictutors.hk@gmail.com,我們會盡快與你們聯絡。
(我們視導師介紹服務為義務工作,並不打算徵收家長任何費用。)


註一﹕所有導師和家長都會自動成為本中心的會員,將來任何活動或優惠都會以電郵通知,請各位附上電郵地址以便聯絡。
註二﹕我們計劃每年舉行最少一次學生音樂會,會員可以優惠價參與演出。

2025年2月10日星期一

Sunday Ticket Lawsuit: Breaking Down the $4.7 Billion Verdict & Recent Overturn

A class action lawsuit against the NFL and DirecTV has recently taken center stage, with a California jury delivering a landmark verdict. The case, which challenges the exclusive rights agreement between the NFL and DirecTV for the Sunday Ticket package, has significant implications for both football fans and the broader sports broadcasting industry.

Key Developments: A $4.7 Billion Verdict

In a stunning development, a California jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $4.7 billion in damages against the NFL and DirecTV. This ruling, which could potentially double or triple in the coming appeals, underscores the high stakes involved in this antitrust lawsuit.

Understanding the NFL Sunday Ticket Lawsuit

The lawsuit, initiated by a group of consumers, alleges that the NFL and DirecTV created an illegal monopoly by offering the Sunday Ticket package exclusively through DirecTV. This package allows subscribers to watch out-of-market NFL games, which aren't broadcast locally, for a premium price. The plaintiffs argue that this exclusivity limits consumer choice, inflates prices, and violates federal antitrust laws.

Critical Questions: Did the NFL Violate Antitrust Laws?

  • What is the NFL Sunday Ticket?
    The Sunday Ticket is a premium package that offers access to out-of-market NFL games not broadcast locally, available only through DirecTV.

  • Who are the plaintiffs?
    The lawsuit was filed by a group of consumers representing a larger class of affected individuals.

  • What are the allegations?
    The plaintiffs claim that the NFL and DirecTV’s exclusive arrangement constitutes an illegal monopoly, driving up prices and limiting consumer options.

  • What does the lawsuit seek?
    The plaintiffs are seeking damages and an injunction to terminate the exclusive agreement between the NFL and DirecTV.

  • What could this mean for football fans?
    If the jury’s decision holds through appeals, it could pave the way for more options and lower prices for fans wanting to watch out-of-market NFL games.

The Bigger Picture: Implications for Sports Broadcasting

The verdict in this case could have far-reaching consequences for how sports broadcasting rights are sold and distributed. If the plaintiffs ultimately prevail, it could reshape the landscape of sports media, offering more choices and potentially lower costs for consumers.

Did You Know?

If the NFL and DirecTV are unable to overturn the verdict on appeal, the financial damages could soar past $7.1 billion, making this one of the most significant antitrust cases in recent memory.

Update


A significant update occurred in the $4.7 billion Sunday NFL Ticket lawsuit. A federal judge recently overturned the jury's massive verdict against the NFL. U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled in favor of the NFL, citing flawed methodologies in the testimony of key expert witnesses presented by the plaintiffs. Judge Gutierrez stated that without these testimonies, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages. As a result, the NFL was granted judgment as a matter of law, effectively nullifying the previous jury's decision. This marks a critical victory for the NFL in a case that has been ongoing since 2015, although the plaintiffs may seek to appeal the ruling


NFL sunday ticket